Should I Buy The Pixel 2 Xl NEW!
In general, Pixel 2 XL color doesn't affect price,resale value, or depreciation very much on Swappa -- so you should alwayspick whichever color you like best.Other factors, such as condition, and storage size have a much largerinfluence onPixel 2 XL prices.
should i buy the pixel 2 xl
Both phones have a 12.2 megapixel rear camera capable of recording 4K video at 30 FPS, 1080p video at 120 FPS, and 720p video at 240 FPS. The camera also contains phase-detection autofocus, laser autofocus, and HDR+ processing. The Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL also include the Pixel Visual Core (PVC) image processor for faster and lower power image processing, though it was not enabled until Android 8.1 was released in January 2018.[9][10] The PVC was custom design by Google's consumer hardware team with collaboration from Intel.[11] The Pixels do not have support for 4K video at 60 FPS, as the processor is not powerful enough.[12][13] The Pixel 2 includes optical image stabilization which the Pixel lacked. Google uses Fused Video Stabilization which reduces issues with camera shake, motion blur, rolling shutter distortion, and focus breathing as found in other image stabilization methods.[14]
There are also reports of a screen burn-in problems Google Pixel XL when a static image remains on the OLED display for too long. So far, the issues are faint and shouldn't dissuade you. We'll keep this review updated as we hear more and if you want to keep up with the problems impacting some models, head over to our guide that can teach you how to fix some of them.
But the issues with the Pixel 2 XL have completely overshadowed an awesome alternative on the market right now: the Pixel 2. Yes, it's smaller, and yes, it doesn't have the expansive display of its larger brother. But the Pixel 2 takes all the good parts of the Pixel 2 XL and packages them into an ergonomic frame, while leaving the terrible screen behind. It's this phone you should be buying, not the Pixel 2 XL.
We want to add some info regarding the blue tint that some of you have been asking about. The slight blue tint is inherent in the display hardware and only visible when you hold the screen at a sharp angle. All displays are susceptible to some level of color shift (e.g. red, yellow, blue) when viewing from off angles due to the pixel cavity design. Similar to our choice with a cooler white point, we went with what users tend to prefer and chose a design that shifts blue.
The Google Pixel 2 XL was released in October 2017 alongside the Pixel 2. The Pixel 2 XL was bigger in size as compared to the Pixel 2, and also included a bigger battery. But overall the feature set was similar. The Pixel 2 XL featured a 6.0-inch FHD+ OLED display, and a 3520 mAh battery. Other hardware features included the Snapdragon 835 processor with 4GB of RAM and up to 128GB of internal storage space. Software related camera features included Night Sight, Portrait Mode, and HDR+, with the camera hardware being an 8MP front-facing camera and 12.2MP dual-pixel rear-facing camera.
Compared to the Pixel 2 and 2 XL, the Pixel 4a 5G and 5 have more RAM, the same amount of storage (or more, if you have a 64GB Pixel 2), an additional wide-angle camera, and 5G support. The Snapdragon 765G in both phones should be about as fast in real-world usage as the Snapdragon 835 chipset in the Pixel 2, and the extra RAM and faster storage will also help performance.
Since smartphone manufacturers still think paying more for phones means you shouldn't have a headphone jack, only the cheaper Pixel 4a 5G has a 3.5mm audio connector. The Pixel 2 was the first Google phone to drop the connector, so you won't lose anything jumping to the jack-less Pixel 5, but you would get the port pack with the 4a 5G.
With the original Pixel phones, Google and its manufacturing partner HTC created a solid phone that was perhaps a bit derivative in design, but none the less had a unique aesthetic to it that helped to separate it from other flagship phones. The Pixel 2 phones, in turn, do not significantly rock the boat here. Instead they come off as a natural evolution of the original pixel phones.
In terms of overall quality, one of the big focal points of the original Pixel phones was to have the highest quality smartphone camera on the market. And while the Pixel has since been surpassed, Google is continuing to pursue that direction with the Pixel 2. While DxOMark is not the sole arbitrator of camera quality, the record-setting score of 98 means that the Pixel 2 phones should be very competitive in the market, and that the Pixel 2 will be worth keeping an eye on.
Released a month after the regular-sized Pixel 2, the 2 XL is a 6in smartphone with a P-OLED screen and a 20-megapixel rear camera that, according to DxOMark, is unbeatable. The latest Snapdragon 835 processor runs the show, complete with 4GB of RAM and a choice of either 64GB or 128GB of non-expandable storage.
Although the Google Pixel 2 XL is water resistant and designed to withstand any wet weather conditions, you should still take the proper precautions and purchase a waterproof case to protect your device. If you do encounter water damage or any other device issues, bring your Google Pixel 2 XL to the trained professionals at CPR Cell Phone Repair. Our repair process is quick and effective, and our skilled staff can get your device working like new!
I absolutely LOVE my loopy case! Although I want other cases and there are very few cases for my Google pixel 2xl. I want the leopard one or camo ? Something cute!!! Please please please make use some cute ones!
The battery life for Pixel is longer than it is for the X. The X lasts around 10 hours and 49 minutes on average while the Pixel lass around 12 hours 9 minutes. Both are good enough to get you through the day, and will most likely last through the night if you forget to plug it in before bed. But the Pixel gives you more ease at mind. It has one of the longest battery lives on the market. However, the Pixel takes a little longer to charge. The X can reach 50% power in around half an hour, while the Pixel is closer to 45 minutes. The pixel slows down as it gets closer to 100% also, and complaints have come in that the phone takes a very long time to reach full battery. As for the methods on how the charge them; the Pixel uses a standard USB Type-C charger. With the iPhone X you can either use USB Lightning cable that comes with the phone or you can use a third party charging pad to charge your phone wirelessly. Despite some concerns, the phone charges just as fast as it would with the chord as it does on the wireless chargers.
For what it's worth, I have a pixel 2 XL and the versa works just fine. I get all of my notifications and exercise tracking works great. The only thing I can't do is control music but to me that really doesn't matter. My headphones have buttons on them anyways.
If you haven't jumped on the Pixel bandwagon, you're missing out. The industry leading cameras and the intuitive artificial intelligence alone should have been enough to sway you back when the Pixel 2 was announced. If you're thinking about making the switch from other brands, our only question is: what have you been waiting for?!
In 2019, I still prefer pixel 2 among my iPhone x. Literally the camera quality is far better than other competitors with huge price brackets. If you're required a high-end camera smartphone in low budget you definitely need to go for it.
Google will not refund my money after I purchased it directly from them a little over a month ago (with insurance). There are clearly hardware issues, but yet all you see online are glowing reviews. There should be a recall. It is not right google with all of it's power selling a crap product and probably blocking, squashing, and otherwise covering up a bad product.
FWIW, I shoot Nikon FF, (right now, my very nice D610), and it has excellent image quality and when I have it with me, that is what I shoot with. I use a Lifepixel modded D5300 for Astrophotography, and it does well enough.
Also even that article points out the issues of not having OIS yet dropping to 1/7s shutter speed in low light. Pixel 2 has OIS and doesn't drop below 1/30s typically, making it generally more versatile for low light photography (it should probably drop to lower shutter speed when no movement is detected in a scene - its OIS is incredibly effective).
It looks a touch too red like the pixels are bleeding a little.If you google 'portraits', most of the colour portraits are desaturated. Of those that are saturated, they are mostly of tanned skin tones.
What is more of an issue in my opinion is that blue color shift in the pixel 2 XL! I know the camera hardware and software in the pixel2 series is excellent, but how could they let that screen to be used on the Pixel 2 is beyond me
Yes, I'm more than okay with it. In fact, I wish Camera Maker would implement more of computational photography into our existing camera. If you HONEST about it: every Digital Camera is a form of computational photography. For example, Sony Camera (well know for their inferior optics) implements software fixed in its lens profile to correct for barrel distortion, vignetting, and CA. By youre own arguments, should we removed them as well? What about post-processing, raw-processing, and photoshop, I can easily argue they fall into the digital MANIPULATION as well. Blaming technology often become a sloppy slope, where does it end?
Most of all, when I go back & see where I took the time and the care, and that I did bother to "lug" a "massive" RX100 type with me, I'm glad I did. I'm not an everyday snapshooter for the most part, and the effort--as if it's that huge anyway--is worth it easily, and it should be for EVERYBODY who's not a mere snapshooter.
@noisephotographer - it probably is (in '35mm equivalent' terms) as that seems about typical for the 'phone cameras I've used so far. But it's odd that this isn't made explicit. I went to Google's site and looked at their 'Tech Specs' section - it only gives the same information found here: pixel count, f/# and pixel pitch. Of those I would have thought the last relatively uninteresting to most users. Focal length is a key parameter and one I'd expect addressed as standard. 041b061a72